It saddens me to forward the news that our good friend and fellow photographer, Matt Quinn, has passed. As some of you may know, he had been battling cancer for a while and was on his way to recovery. Please take a moment to remember him in your prayers. |
Image Processing ⇒ Learning the Tilt-Shift Blur Option in Photoshop CC 2018
- Charles Haacker
- Mentoris Primus
- Posts: 1841
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 7:20 pm
- Location: Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
- Editing option: No, please do not edit my images
- Contact:
Learning the Tilt-Shift Blur Option in Photoshop CC 2018
We've been talking a ittle about this regarding Dave Chinn's Big Kahuna, where he has been trying to get a believable blur in the background. I happened upon a tutorial on this (the stuff about the tilt/shift blur starts about the halfway mark) and decided to try it. Here is my progress report:
This one is the original Lightroom adjusted image. The problem is that even shooting wide open my 1" sensor still carries the depth of field too deep into the background so my buddy here doesn't stand out as I would have liked.
So this one was my first somewhat clumsy attempt at the tilt/shift blur. I made a bunch'a misteaks so it looks phony as a 3-dollar bill, but I learned something in the process...
This one I just did. I think it's a lot better. The falloff from foreground to background is more believable (I hope) and I backed off the overall blur since I thought originally it was too much.
BUT DOES THIS FOOL THE EYE? (If you open these three in tabs and reduce the size to fit the screen you can toggle among them and see the effects.)
This one is the original Lightroom adjusted image. The problem is that even shooting wide open my 1" sensor still carries the depth of field too deep into the background so my buddy here doesn't stand out as I would have liked.
So this one was my first somewhat clumsy attempt at the tilt/shift blur. I made a bunch'a misteaks so it looks phony as a 3-dollar bill, but I learned something in the process...
This one I just did. I think it's a lot better. The falloff from foreground to background is more believable (I hope) and I backed off the overall blur since I thought originally it was too much.
BUT DOES THIS FOOL THE EYE? (If you open these three in tabs and reduce the size to fit the screen you can toggle among them and see the effects.)
Friends call me Chuck.
This link takes you to my Flickr albums. Please click on any album to scroll through it.
(I prefer to present pictures in albums because I can put them in specific order.)
All the great photographers use cameras! No, really.

(I prefer to present pictures in albums because I can put them in specific order.)
All the great photographers use cameras! No, really.

- minniev
- Mentoris Imperator
- Posts: 4583
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2016 3:55 am
- Location: Mississippi
- Editing option: Yes, feel free to edit my image
- Contact:
Thank you for sharing this Chuck, it's a technique I know I will find a good use for. M43 cameras have the mixed blessing and curse of holding LOTS in focus even at apertures of, let's say, 1.8. Sometimes I am trying to do exactly what you were trying to do here. You did it well, too, by the way.
"God gave me photography so that I could pray with my eyes" - Dewitt Jones
- Bob Yankle
- Mentoris Peritus
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2017 2:53 pm
- Location: Burlington, NC
- Editing option: Yes, you can edit but ask me first
- Contact:
A useful tool, Chuck, and you got better at this with a bit of muscle memory. I liked the wood sculpture as well. I would be tempted to play with its lighting values with a bit of texture to make it even more dramatic.
- Charles Haacker
- Mentoris Primus
- Posts: 1841
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 7:20 pm
- Location: Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
- Editing option: No, please do not edit my images
- Contact:
minniev wrote:Thank you for sharing this Chuck, it's a technique I know I will find a good use for. M43 cameras have the mixed blessing and curse of holding LOTS in focus even at apertures of, let's say, 1.8. Sometimes I am trying to do exactly what you were trying to do here. You did it well, too, by the way.
Thanks, Min. Micro 4/3 sensors have a crop factor of 2 (my 1" has a crop factor of 2.7), so that's what, half the size of a full frame? So yeah, it's harder to get that blur or bokeh. I was pretty happy when I went up from a 1/1.7, but like everything else sometimes that goes-on-forever DOF was useful, sometimes not.
Bob Yankle wrote:A useful tool, Chuck, and you got better at this with a bit of muscle memory. I liked the wood sculpture as well. I would be tempted to play with its lighting values with a bit of texture to make it even more dramatic.
Thanks Bob. I think I tend more to "straight" photography, a documentary approach. I love what you do (!!) and of course I have no compunction about changing or blurring a background or swapping a face, but I just can't seem to get into more creative PP. (Doesn't mean I won't...

Friends call me Chuck.
This link takes you to my Flickr albums. Please click on any album to scroll through it.
(I prefer to present pictures in albums because I can put them in specific order.)
All the great photographers use cameras! No, really.

(I prefer to present pictures in albums because I can put them in specific order.)
All the great photographers use cameras! No, really.

- davechinn
- Mentoris Primus
- Posts: 1741
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 3:01 pm
- Location: Ky
- Editing option: No, please do not edit my images
- Contact:
Charles Haacker wrote:We've been talking a ittle about this regarding Dave Chinn's Big Kahuna, where he has been trying to get a believable blur in the background. I happened upon a tutorial on this (the stuff about the tilt/shift blur starts about the halfway mark) and decided to try it. Here is my progress report:
This one is the original Lightroom adjusted image. The problem is that even shooting wide open my 1" sensor still carries the depth of field too deep into the background so my buddy here doesn't stand out as I would have liked.
01.jpg
So this one was my first somewhat clumsy attempt at the tilt/shift blur. I made a bunch'a misteaks so it looks phony as a 3-dollar bill, but I learned something in the process...
02.jpg
This one I just did. I think it's a lot better. The falloff from foreground to background is more believable (I hope) and I backed off the overall blur since I thought originally it was too much.
03.jpgBUT DOES THIS FOOL THE EYE? (If you open these three in tabs and reduce the size to fit the screen you can toggle among them and see the effects.)
Yes, I think #3 is believable Chuck !!! It's spot on to my eyes. Now I think its time to get back to the Big Kahuna. Thanks for the link to the tutorial.
Dave
https://www.davechinn.com/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/35722922@N02/albums
Don’t shoot what it looks like. Shoot what it feels like.
David Alan Harvey
https://www.flickr.com/photos/35722922@N02/albums
Don’t shoot what it looks like. Shoot what it feels like.
David Alan Harvey
- St3v3M
- Key Founding Member
- Posts: 4488
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2016 1:02 am
- Location: 35,000 feet
- Editing option: Yes, feel free to edit my image
- Contact:
I still find it amazing the things you can do it in post. It's as amazing as it is scary I guess. Thanks for explaining another tool! S-
"Take photographs, leave footprints, steal hearts"
- Charles Haacker
- Mentoris Primus
- Posts: 1841
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 7:20 pm
- Location: Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
- Editing option: No, please do not edit my images
- Contact:
davechinn wrote:Yes, I think #3 is believable Chuck !!! It's spot on to my eyes. Now I think its time to get back to the Big Kahuna. Thanks for the link to the tutorial.
Dave
You're welcome, Dave. See below...
St3v3M wrote:I still find it amazing the things you can do it in post. It's as amazing as it is scary I guess. Thanks for explaining another tool! S-
You're welcome, Steve. As it happens I am getting ready to join the discussion on ethics in photography, and coming back to this image makes me think about the ethics of it. I wanted to better isolate and highlight the main subject, just as Dave does with his Big Kahuna. But my background was too sharp, and while sure there were ways I could have mitigated it in camera, probably best by moving back and using a longer focal length (I was already wide open at f/2.8), I didn't do that, but I have the tools and developing (no pun) skill to mitigate it in post. Do I have to tell every person who looks at the "shopped" picture that it's not how it first looked? As it happens I have the series up on my Flickr so it's "fully disclosed," but...

Friends call me Chuck.
This link takes you to my Flickr albums. Please click on any album to scroll through it.
(I prefer to present pictures in albums because I can put them in specific order.)
All the great photographers use cameras! No, really.

(I prefer to present pictures in albums because I can put them in specific order.)
All the great photographers use cameras! No, really.

- St3v3M
- Key Founding Member
- Posts: 4488
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2016 1:02 am
- Location: 35,000 feet
- Editing option: Yes, feel free to edit my image
- Contact:
Charles Haacker wrote:You're welcome, Steve. As it happens I am getting ready to join the discussion on ethics in photography, and coming back to this image makes me think about the ethics of it. I wanted to better isolate and highlight the main subject, just as Dave does with his Big Kahuna. But my background was too sharp, and while sure there were ways I could have mitigated it in camera, probably best by moving back and using a longer focal length (I was already wide open at f/2.8), I didn't do that, but I have the tools and developing (no pun) skill to mitigate it in post. Do I have to tell every person who looks at the "shopped" picture that it's not how it first looked? As it happens I have the series up on my Flickr so it's "fully disclosed," but...
I'm learning so much here and am always thankful when we help each other, thank you for that! And ethics you say? I'll have to look into that! S-
"Take photographs, leave footprints, steal hearts"
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 13 Replies
- 984 Views
-
Last post by St3v3M
Tue Jun 12, 2018 1:23 am
-
-
Retouching Before There Was Photoshop (Two Links)
by Charles Haacker » Mon Jul 09, 2018 6:31 pm » in Image Processing - 3 Replies
- 341 Views
-
Last post by St3v3M
Mon Jul 16, 2018 3:00 am
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests