"Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can." —Arthur Ashe

Image ProcessingBuild your own "Sliding-Box" Cameras

Post-processing: Editing techniques, software, hardware and other resources. Chemical or digital.
From simple corrections to multi-layered edits, actions, tone mapping and more.
User avatar
Charles Haacker
Mentoris Secundus
Mentoris Secundus
Posts: 1031
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 7:20 pm
Reputation: 94
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
Social Media Opt-In: No
Editing option: No, please do not edit my images
Contact:

Re: Build your own "Sliding-Box" Cameras

Postby Charles Haacker » Sat Nov 11, 2017 3:10 pm

James, I've always found your craftsmanship and imagination astonishing. The really brilliant innovation is using photo paper as a negative. I imagine that you then scan the image, reverse it to a positive, and flip it right way 'round? The long exposures make the paper negatives essentially like what the early guys had to contend with. Seeing the smear of movement in the plants gives great authenticity, almost as if you'd had to hurry to the camera with a wet collodion plate. I truly admire what you do! :thanks:
Friends call me Chuck. :photo: This link takes you to my Flickr albums. Please click on any album to scroll through it.
(I prefer to present pictures in albums because I can put them in specific order.)

All the great photographers use cameras! No, really. :|

User avatar
Duck
Key Founding Member
Key Founding Member
Posts: 1877
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 6:31 am
Reputation: 151
Location: Shelton, CT
Social Media Opt-In: Yes
Editing option: No, please do not edit my images
Contact:

Re: Build your own "Sliding-Box" Cameras

Postby Duck » Thu Nov 16, 2017 2:19 pm

I was saddened to hear that Harman was discontinuing their Direct Positive paper. Then elated when they gave to the outraged demand and brought it back. In the interim I found a kickstarter project called Galaxy Hyper Speed. I purchased a pack of 4x5 and played around with it and was reasonably pleased, but as I did not have anything to compare against I just took it at face value.

What papers do you play with and what's your opinions of them?

Thanks
"If you didn't learn something new today, you wasted a day."
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage


Return to “Image Processing”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests